Andrew on Monotheism

                As world religions go, those that have become the most influential in modern times are predominantly monotheistic.  In fact, with the exception from Hinduism—which is relatively exclusive location wise—the worship of multiple gods has seemingly gone out of fashion, much like denim jackets.  Why this swing in popularity occurred is a topic about which I’m sure many books have been written; any number of reasons could be cited to account for the lack of polytheism in modern belief systems.  However, the way I see it, these reasons are unimportant.  Religion, like fashion, caters to those affected by it, changed by the slightest whim in public opinion.  Certain ideas become popular and then die out; others never get off the ground at all. 

                The smash hits Christianity, Islam, and Judaism are in many ways the blue-jeans of religion, whereas the corduroys that are paganism are simply no longer in style.  Who can tell why suddenly every girl in school is wearing tan suede booties?  Somewhere along the road it just caught on—in Christianity’s case, the Roman emperor Constantine I had a conniption and made Christianity the state religion out of nowhere.  Before this it was no more than an obscure cult, and would have remained so.  Similarly, had the Allies lost World War II, there would certainly be no more Judaism today, we would simply learn about it in mythology class as we do the Greek or Norse beliefs.  Religion is not a product of the evolution of society, society merely plays off of whatever beliefs happen to be present.  The only way religion has even been able to continually appeal to modern societies is by diluting and remodeling even the most fundamental of beliefs.  Most Americans would probably go insane if forced to practice Christianity in its original form.

                This is probably as good a time as any to admit that (if you haven’t already noticed) I’m not a huge fan of monotheistic religions.  And aside from the aforementioned points, a lot of this has to do simply with the classification of “monotheistic”.  Society tends to regard the polytheistic religions of the past with a dismissive attitude, labeling them “myth” which even in its least degrading meaning suggests falseness.  “Monotheistic” is a term that is assigned to a mythology to give it a level of plausibility, often regardless of whether or not only one god is truly worshipped.  In Christianity, for instance, God is three separate beings, who can act and interact independently, and several important angels are also featured prominently.  Yet society feels the need to differentiate, simply because the concept of a single, mysteriously powerful being is more popular.  In reality, all of the modern “monotheistic” faiths are somewhat polytheistic, simply because they—like every other religion—adhere to certain principals of mythology that are no different than those of the ancient pagans.  The opposite is also true: Greek city-states more often than not worshipped a single deity—the pantheon that we learn about is simply the conglomeration of all the major gods and goddesses in the culture as a whole.  The classification of “monotheistic” or “polytheistic” is therefore not really useful in discerning the nature of a religion. 

                Now to tie all these various thoughts together somehow.  In short, religions, monotheistic or otherwise, rise and fall due to chance as much as anything else, conforming to what people will accept, and thus cannot be ordered in relevance based on classifications.

I swear to Gods

"It's called monotheism, but it looks like downsizing to me"

I know this is quite basic but I want to start off with this.  Monotheism is the belief in a single, all powerful God. The word Monotheism derives from the Greek words theos – which means god and monos – which means one. Polytheism is the belief in many gods. Polytheistic religions include all religions except Judaism, Christianity, Islam and Sikhism, the only monotheistic religions. A character trait of all monotheistic religions that has shown up all through history is that they believe that God created all reality and is totally self-sufficient. Also monotheistic religions are exclusive, denying existence of gods of all other religions, unlike polytheists who believe that there can be more gods than what they themselves worship.

As the world modernized it seemed to push further and further towards a comfort in monotheistic religions.  I think that with a progression in science and education the need for many Gods faded.  The development of an understanding of the world caused faith to rest in singular almighty power.

Unfortunately this transition to monotheism negatively affected culture, because as religion was being transformed the question grew, who is right?  Which religion had the true story of the real one God if there even was one.  No longer needing and explanation for natural events society no longer needed multiple Gods and the purpose of the one was mostly for creation stories and beliefs.  The varying ideas on the one God has caused tension and has stemmed fighting and war for years since.

The ignorance of the majority of people has contributed to the lack of appreciation for other’s beliefs, making monotheism become the center of issues not necessary.  However, for those who believe, monotheism in modern day is the easier more available and more believable solution to people of faith.

I wish I could have some really cool abstract opinion on Judaism 4.0 but i have to agree with my fellow bloggers.  The up and coming religion has got to be science it is the direction most people are going towards for guidance logic and a reliable source of information. According to John Teehan, an associate professor in the religion department at Hofstra University, the traditional religions’ ethics and moral teachings fit with psychology while the scientific side explains how things were naturally made.  This transition for the two will soon become more common.

science and religion

science and religion

Religion Blog

EFFECT

When looking at mythology as a religion, I do believe there is a difference between the way older polytheistic mythology affected people compared to the role modern monotheistic mythology plays in contemporary society. First of all, in America we have separation of Church and State which gives everyone the freedom to choose if they even want to believe in a mythology without any detrimental effects. This is an idea that most ancient cultures and even some cultures today never embraced and an idea that would have had a major effect had it been popular in those times where polytheism was the prominent mythology/religion.

Secondly, as everyone has mentioned, science now dominates faith when it comes to how we perceive and explain the world around us. Almost every natural phenomena can now be explained through modern science. The role that monotheistic mythology now plays in peoples is more spiritual than physical. Whereas ancient cultures would pray to a god for a good harvest, people today are much more likely to appeal to a monotheistic god when in spiritual or emotional peril. Not to say that ancient cultures did not do this, it is just that in contemporary times people no longer ask for material things, rather they ask for spiritual guidance or safety. As humans we tend to appeal to a higher authority when we believe that things are beyond our control. I suppose that in the 21st century, with all our science and technology, the amount of things that we perceive as beyond our control is a constantly decreasing number.

Judaism 4.0

I am going to go along with the science theme and say that Evolutionism is the next major religion. Natural selection and many of the principles of Darwinism are so widely accepted nowadays that I believe it’s really only a matter of time before people start altering their lives to accommodate them. People could genetically select children with favorable traits and abort them if they aren’t good enough, because hey, they probably wouldn’t have survived anyway and they certainly aren’t contributing to the evolution of the human race. Or perhaps they could just bypass the middleman and alter their embryos and select the favorable traits that way. Then the whole world will be like Gattaca and eugenics will be widely accepted and everyone will be Aryan and Hitler will resurrect rise to power again. DOOMSDAY I TELL YOU. Doomsday….

P.S. I’m just curious what would those who argued that monotheism was more widely accepted because it was simpler and less strict have to say about Judaism or Islam, which have no shortage of rituals and a much stricter belief system. I can’t imagine having to pray 5 times a day being much of a selling point when trying to convert a pagan. The focus was mostly on Christianity which is frankly pretty lax as far as religions go.

Blog Number 8

Religion is something I have come to realize means a lot of different things to different people, so I’ll do my best to succinctly get across why I think there’s differences between monotheism and polytheism, and why monotheism seems to be the more appealing of the two.

I think that contemporary religion is extremely different from the older mythologies we have studied.  One of the biggest differences between religion then and now is that it isn’t centered geographically. Egypt, Greece and Rome adopted the same beliefs as those around them. Major similarities exist between cultures that lived in close proximity. Today, especially in America, the “melting pot” country, the religion of a group of people is hardly determined by where you live.  Beliefs are largely watered down in younger generations, and many different versions of the original belief systems have divided into variating branches. Catholicism, especially has been cut up into different sects.

Christianity, being one of the more popular monotheistic religions, is divided up as a sort of Kingdom, with the Lord at the head and the Son, and the Holy Spirit at each side. Perhaps, monotheism, being less complex, and more similar to a monarchy in some ways, is easier for worshippers to understand and relate to. China believed in some ways that their King was a direct disciple of their God, so perhaps there are some ties in connecting government and monotheism. I think you can almost look at most monotheistic religions as a moral monarchy.

Mandate of Heaven

Mandate of Heaven

 I think there are several differences between the styles of worship presented by monotheistic and polytheistic worship. Polytheistic worships requires a different God for each aspect of life, whether it be agriculture or family or wisdom. Each problem in a mortal’s life was determined by which god was angered and why. Greek polytheism had so many gods it was like a soap opera in the sky, needing a directory to figure out which god killed your potato crop couldn’t have been easy. Polytheism remains in a time when more attention was paid to the intricacy of the religion. When I was little I had trouble doing the sign of the cross in the right order so I can’t imagine trying to pass on polytheism and having to explain its storming because Poseidon is angry as opposed to Zeus. Perhaps I’m looking at this too broadly, but in a society thats grown hungry for efficiency over the last two centuries I am not surprised that polytheistic religions have fallen off the radar a bit.

 

Monotheism vs. Polytheism

The Structure

trinity-godhoodIn many contemporary religions such as Christianity, there is a blury line to as whether it should be classified as monotheistic. The trinity, the father the son and the holy spirit, can be compared to the Hindu trinity, Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva, which is considered to be a polytheistic religion. However, all parts of the trinities are actually only one in the same of the all mighty being…which is a little confusing. In my eyes, it is very difficult to find a true monotheistic religion because there are so many different parts and so many prophets who aren’t supposed to be seen as gods, but are often worshipped and loved the same way as the one god.

The Lasting Effect..Affect? Effect.

I think monotheism effects its believers very similarly to older religions. To many people, religion is a major part of their lives, it helps guide them in making good decisions, how to live a “sin-free” life, and even at times, who to marry. This is very similar to older cultures who worshipped many gods. Just like im Christianity, the Mayans didn’t want to piss off their gods, so they would make sacrifices. Cultures all over the world with polytheistic views prayed to their gods for good health and good crops just as how monotheistic believers pray for good fortune in their lives. Both types of religion has major effects on how their followers lived their lives, but the big difference between the two is that in monotheism, believers serve their god based on a loving relationship, or they are supposed to, not just out of fear. However, in tsu325BCIndiaPoseidonGrShippolytheism, such as in Greek culture, they served their gods out of fear that Poseidon would creat a flood or send a blood thirsty Minotaur to the shores of their village. But I believe as the overall effect goes, both types of religions effected their followers more similarly than differently.

The Purpose

gods-loveI believe that monotheism is more appealing to the modern man because it is much more personal and much simplier. As time moves on, everyone is looking for the easiest thing, like self-starting cars and such.  Why pray to 20 gods when someone only has to worry about 1 all powerful god? Monotheism is just easier, therefore more appealing. However, it is also based on a more personal level. In monotheism there is the belief that god created the earth and people for the loving relationship that could be fostered, in gods eyes we are his children and are made indiviually by him with love. However, in other religions, the relationship with humans and gods are not focused on and made into the major part of the reason for worship. Monotheism effects people inside while polytheism is more like, well there are a bunch of gods who will send forth war and floods and lightening if we do not please them. Poseidon was very cruel to man, where as God is kind and forgiving. The easier, more personal religion obviously wins the modern man’s heart.

Judaism 4.0

As of now there isn’t any Judaism 4.0. The only thing i can really think of is momonism, because it is sort of derived from Christianity in that they believe in Jesus and God, but see things a little differently than the Christians do. But, as someone else said in their blog, I have no doubt that a Judaism 4.0 will emerge soon, with all the crazy Scientology religions and such, there is bond to be another formed soon.

Blog Number Eight

So believe it or not but I’m actually pretty upset that my Mythology blogging career is coming to a close. Not that I was particularly good at it but I definitely learned from the experience.

Monotheism vs. Polytheismreligion

Religion has been the keystone aspect of many societies since the age of man. It has played a major role economically, socially, and politically. Even though the presence of religion is not as overwhelming in modern society, we can still see it playing an active part in places such as pop culture and politics. 

 The polytheistic religions were definitely more popular in the “olden days.” The people of that age used the numerous gods and goddess to explain natural phenomenon’s they didn’t know the answers to. Honestly, I think the reason polytheistic religions went out of style, if you will, is because science came into play. Once people figured out the real reasons for the occurrences they previously

World_Religiondidn’t have explanations for, they didn’t need to believe in the superior beings any longer.

 Science is weaving its way into society more and more. It could definitely be argued that it is taking the place of religion. Why? I believe it is as simple as: Proven facts always outweigh theories. It is easier for people to believe in something when they can see the proof. Science allows man to see definite results when the experiments confirm their hypotheses.

Therefore, monotheistic and polytheistic religions are running out of steam. Monotheistic religions however, are more popular because they are easier to follow. There is only one God to worship and everything in that religion pertains to that one God. It is just more simple so it doesn’t take as much effort to follow.

BLOG #8

Religion has been a part of human life for many, many years. It’s gone through changes and new forms have evolved to suit the people of the times’ needs and beliefs. The more recent monotheistic religions Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all worship the same God, but have their slight differences.

However, when looking at monotheism vs. polytheism things aren’t that different as one would assume. As John and Chris have already pointed out… yes, the number of Gods are different. But only the fact that in monotheism there is one major God and polytheism has many major Gods. Monotheism slips around their title by having other entities that people worship. There is one large overarching God, but He isn’t alone. There are angels, demons, spirits, etc. that are also a large part of the monotheistic religions.

I like to look at monotheistic religions as a sports team. God  is the captain, but you need other members to make the team successful. The captain couldn’t win by himself and nobody would want to join the team if it was just a one-man-show. If monotheistic religions were purely one God, than why wouldn’t we call Islam, Allah instead?

Polytheistic religions were popular in the ancient days when people needed a God or Goddess for every aspect of life. Greece being the major example that we’ve looked at. If they wanted to be successful in battle they would pray to Ares or wanted luck with love they would call upon Aphrodite. Monotheism decided to combine all of these things and make it easier to just be able to pray to one God for many things.

As times change, people change

I think monotheism appeals to the modern man better because it’s simpler. You only have one God to worry about rather than hundreds that are impossible to remember. It wouldn’t make sense that people worshipped the same religion and entities for centuries. Religion will eventually become outdated and need to be revised.

I have no idea what Judaism 4.0 will be. I do think it will come to exist soon because as we know in America, there’s always a better version around the corner.

Blog 8

Religion has evolved so much throughout human history.  Starting off as mostly polytheistic,  religion eventually evolved into the monotheistic religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam (monotheism 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 respectively).  What’s honestly different between these polytheistic and monotheistic religions?

There’s a Connection…

The most obvious difference between monotheism and polytheism is the number of gods.  Monotheism has one, polytheism has many.  Even with this seemingly massive difference between the two, I don’t think they’re as different as they’re made out to be.

The one huge connection between the structure of monotheism and the

Archangels... or lesser gods?

Archangels... or lesser gods?

structure of polytheism isn’t the number of gods, it’s the number of holy deities that are “worshiped.”  While there may only be one God in monotheism, there are many different angels, demons, and holy saints that are “worshiped.”  Let’s look at an example…

… An Example

Let’s take the Greek gods and put them next to Christianity.  The Greeks had Zeus as their most important and powerful god.  He accomplished many things and was the ruler of the heavens.  He didn’t do everything so there were other, lesser gods to help him out (Poseidon, Hermes, etc.).  These lesser gods were still important and worshiped but not to the extent that Zeus was.

Now look at Christianity.  There’s only one God (referred to as God, go figure)

Zeus or God?

Zeus or God?

that rules the entire universe.  He’s the only god that can be worshiped and the only true god, but he’s not the only celestial being.  There are archangels that have specific roles that they accomplish (much like how the Greek gods were the patron gods of something).  There are also saints that are prayed to (technically a person prays to a saint so that the saint will ask God for help), much in the same way that the lesser gods of Greece were worshiped and prayed to.

Some Sort of Explanation Why

I think that this happened for a very simple reason: each new religion wanted members.  It’s way easier to get people to change what they worship if they don’t have to change their rituals that much.  If a pagan person could still worship their favorite god, but now that god is called an archangel of Christianity, the pagan person may see no reason why not to convert.

There are so many other examples of this kind of thing happening in history.  Christmas is actually based on the winter solstice, the Virgin Mary is based on an Egyptian god, and even the monomyth can be extended to this topic.

What I’ve learned about monotheism is that it’s just the newest version of religion.  The main ideas are the same (be a good person, don’t cause havoc in your city, etc.) but they’re practiced in different ways.  Maybe if people looked at religion like this, there wouldn’t be so many wars based on religion.

Blog 8

Polytheism

Polytheism

Polytheism was found in many of the older societies. By having so many different gods, the religion was used to explain every aspect of life- weather, health, crop success and failure. When crops failed, people worshipped and sacrificed for the god of fertility. This put comfort in people’s mind to know that they were doing what they could to put a positive effect on trends that in fact, are completely out of people’s control. Having several different gods was never a problem; because people tend to not to mind the complexity of something if it helps them to understand what is going on. Without any other explanation, having a god of everything makes sense. How else would the sun come up every morning? Or rain fall from the sky? However, with the monotheistic religions came scientific discoveries. Discovering the Earth was not the center of the universe was a major defining point in many of the religions.

God of Rain

God of Rain

This not only rejected the idea that the sun revolved around the earth, but also showed that a god was not making the sun rise and fall through the sky. Monotheism does the exact same thing that polytheism, however in this time era, we understand many things we did not before- that weather is a natural phenomena, and that our health depends on our lifestyles, we have outside explanations that our religion no longer needs to cover.

As for a Judaism 4.0, I definitely agree with Mike. Science is taking over many things in our life, and it is putting proof behind what people are expected to believe in for religions. Vinegar and baking soda don’t explode from magic. There’s no science-project-volcano god (that I am aware of anyways), it’s science. Everything around us has a logical explanation and we are just beginning to unravel everything that people have been questioning for hundreds of thousands of years. Again, people are looking for answers and they will follow and trust whatever it is that explains life to them.science neutron

Blog 8

I have to say, I’m kind of sad to see the end of the blogs (不好). I’ve really enjoyed writing them, not to mention winning all of my comment arguments with Fish. I will now stop my nostalgic reflections and trade my flowery prose for some cold hard blogging. It’s time for opinion:

BAM! Opinion! Right between the eyes!

So the whole monotheism thing. I think I’ll address the second point of the prompt first–the bit about affecting the culture and direction of believers. Remember, dear reader, that a large part of mythology is  studying the religious beliefs of cultures past. To us, Zeus is just a character:  a concept, a name, a fictional entity. But to the ancient Greeks, Zeus was real, and larger than life. Thunder wasn’t  the sound of clouds rubbing together, it was Zeus making noise (hint: he wasn’t happy). Thousands of years from now, our God (or Allah or Yahweh) will be seen in the same way–a character, a fictional construct. So monotheism does affect culture in the same way as polytheism does because both are religions, and religion affects man in the same way, no matter if he’s praying to God or the divine Goat.

Had to get this guy back in here.

A nice picture of Bill Gates.

How does religion affect man? It gives him purpose and direction: someone to rant at when he’s upset or feels mistreated, and someone to thank when things go well. Man is not comfortable with the idea that he is utterly alone and isolated. We like to have someone at the wheel. This must be so, otherwise atheism would be far more prevalent. Feeling as though you’re part of some higher plan is as necessary to Bill Gates as it was to Genghis Khan. So religion still affects us in the same way.

The real difference with monotheism and polytheism I think lies in the demands that the belief systems present. With polytheism, you were required to pray to one god for bodily health, and another one for the health of  your animals. Under monotheism, you have a one stop shop. You’re not praying to the god, you’re praying to The God. You don’t need to be as dedicated. No lists of gods to memorize, no time-consuming sacrifices. Monotheism involves less of a time commitment, and is inherently less complicated–mono is always more straight-forward than poly (mono also keeps you out of school longer).

Call in the next five minutes and you’ll receive Scientology at no extra charge!

Convert. Seriously. Yeah. It's loaded.

Mike hits it right on the head: it’s all about simplification. The streamlining of religion will make it more accessible to a majority. Really, it’s  selling a product. A good missionary would have made a superb salesman. You have to convince your average heathen that this system is better than that. And in a field like religion, where results (i.e. did I get to heaven?) are not immediately visible, you’ve got to stress what you’ve got. For monotheism, that’s simplicity.  At the same time, people also like what they know–the “keep your phone number” syndrome.  This is why Christianity is probably the easiest religion to sell–it’s really sectsy (see what I did there? Say it out loud. Yeah. Now hold your tongue and say “apple.”), which means there’s something for everyone.  Still want that vaguely polytheistic feel? Then try Catholicism, with its multitude of saints! Prefer pre-cooked? John Calvin has something you might be interested in! Hate those darn idols? Patriarch, come over here, will ya?

A quick note more on the “keep your number” syndrome. This is precisely why monotheism is structured so similarly to many polytheistic religions. People don’t want anything too radically different, especially when it comes to something as weighty as their immortal being. It’s another sales technique: ease the customer in to something unfamiliar.

The Next Big Thing

I don’t know what Judaism 4.0 is going to be. The problem with Mike’s science theory (sorry Mike, you were the only other blog up…) is that science can only take you so far (Shannon, does this sound familiar?). So the Big Bang is all well and good, but how’d that stuff get there in the first place? Science me that one, Mr. Newton! I think that religion will probably move towards a more personalized feel, perhaps with an ever increasing emphasis on not having to put a lot of effort into it. Alternately, perhaps we’re moving towards the Church of Wal-Martia.

Oh God.